Allergy to cabazitaxel Cross-reactivity between taxanes

Main Article Content

Paola C. Fernández-Paredes
Mariola Navarro Guerrero
Elisa Peñalver de la Puente
J. Damian Lopez-Sanchez

Keywords

cross reactivity, hipersensitivity reaction, taxanes, docetaxel, cabazitaxel

Abstract

A 46-year-old man, with HIV infection A2 stage and chronic C hepatitis was diagnosed with stage 4 prostate cancer with bone metastases in September 2019. His treatment was started with docetaxel, receiving five cycles with good tolerance, after which he received hormonal treatment. Currently, he presents progression of the disease and docetaxel is reintroduced. After infusing the first 5 mL, he showed respiratory distress with thoracic pain and low oxygen saturation (88%) together with lumbar pain. Both tryptase and interleukin 6 (IL-6) levels in blood were measured at the time of the reaction, and were elevated. The case was discussed in an oncology clinical round, and it was decided a change to cabazitaxel. Allergy tests were performed, including skin prick and intradermal tests, with docetaxel and cabazitaxel. A positive result to intradermal test with docetaxel, 10 mg/mL, was obtained 24 h later. Then 48 h
later, another positive intradermal test reaction with 1-mg/mL docetaxel as skin ulceration was reported. However, skin prick and intradermal tests with cabazitaxel were negative. Drug provocation test with cabazitaxel was subsequently performed. After the infusion of 11 mL, the patient presented pharyngeal obstruction with dyspnoea, facial erythema, genital pruritus, and cervical pain that required treatment with intramuscular epinephrine. The results of the allergy study were not concordant with clinical presentation and confirmed the poor predictive value of taxane skin tests.

Abstract 324 | PDF Downloads 291 XML Downloads 13 HTML Downloads 0

References

1. Vega A, Jimenez-Rodriguez T-W, Barranco R, Bartra J, Diéguez MC, Doña I, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to cancer chemotherapy: Practical recommendations of ARADyAL fopr diagnosis and desensitization. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol. 2021; Vol. 31(5): 364-–384. https://doi.org/doi: 10.18176/jiaci.0712

2. Pagani M, Bavbek S, Alvarez-Cuesta E, Berna Dursun A, Bonadonna P, Castells M, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions to chemotherapy: aAn EAACI position paper. Allergy. 2022; 77:388–403. https://doi.org/10.1111/all.15113
3. Sánchez-Muñoz A, Jiménez B, García-Tapiador A, Romero-García G, Medina L, Navarro V, et al. Cross- – sensitivity between taxanes in patients with breast cancer. Clin Transl Oncol. 2011 Dec; 13(12):904-–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12094-011-0753-3
4. Dizon DS, Schwartz J, Rojan A, et al.[A6.1][A6.2] Cross-sensitivity between paclitaxel and docetaxel in a women’'s cancer program. Gynecol Oncol. 2006;100:149-–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2005.08.004
5. Picard M, Pur L, Caiado J, Giavina-Bianchi P, Galvão VR, Berlin ST, Campos SM, Matulonis UA, Castells MCet al. Risk stratification and skin testing to guide re-exposure in taxane-induced hypersensitivity reactions. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2016 Apr; 137(4):1154-11–64.e12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2015.10.039
6. Picard M. Management of hypersensitivity reactions to taxanes. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2017 Nov; 37(4):679-6–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iac.2017.07.004
7. Weiss RB, Donehower RC, Wiernik PH, Ohnuma T, Gralla RJ, Trump DL, et al. Hypersensitivity reactions from taxol. J Clin Oncol., 8 (1990),;8 pp. :1263-126–8. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.1990.8.7.1263
8. A.J. Tije AJ, J. Verweij J, W.J. Loos WJ, A. Sparreboom A. Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles: iImplications for cancer chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet., 42 (2003),;42: pp. 665-6–85. https://doi.org/10.2165/00003088-200342070-00005